reporting quality assessment of randomized controlled trials published in nephrology urology monthly journal

نویسندگان

alireza mehrazmay behavioral sciences research center, baqiyatallah university of medical sciences, tehran, ir iran

alireza karambakhsh behavioral sciences research center, baqiyatallah university of medical sciences, tehran, ir iran

mahmood salesi nephrology and urology research center, baqiyatallah university of medical sciences, tehran, ir iran; nephrology and urology research center, baqiyatallah university of medical sciences, tehran, ir iran. tel/fax: +98-9196805469

چکیده

context randomized controlled trials (rcts) are important tools for evidence-based health care decisions. it is, therefore, important that they be conducted and reported with the highest possible standards. the aim of this study was to evaluate the reporting quality of the rcts published in nephrology urology monthly journal and to examine whether there was a change over time in the reporting quality. evidence acquisition the quality of each report was assessed using the consolidated standards of reporting trials (consort) 2010 statement checklist and a 5-point quality assessment instrument, i.e. the jadad scale. results eighteen (14 iranian and 4 non-iranian) rcts were published from 2012 to 2014 on topics including renal stone (16.6%), hemodialysis and transplantation (38.8%), and prostate conditions (11.1%). interventions comprised surgery, drugs, and teaching method in 7 (38 %), 10 (55%), and 1 (5%) of them, respectively. according to the consort checklist, the weakest reported items were registration number, identification as a randomized trial in the title, and settings and locations where the data were collected. the mean jadad score of the reports was 2.72 ± 1.36 (54% of their maximum possible total score). according to the jadad and consort scales, there was an increase in the quality of reporting from 2012 to 2014. conclusions this assessment shows low reporting quality scores in reports. training courses for researchers, using standard reporting tools (e.g. consort 2010 statement checklist), and consultation with methodologists can improve the quality of published rcts.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reporting Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Nephrology Urology Monthly Journal

CONTEXT Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are important tools for evidence-based health care decisions. It is, therefore, important that they be conducted and reported with the highest possible standards. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reporting quality of the RCTs published in nephrology urology monthly journal and to examine whether there was a change over time in the reporting q...

متن کامل

Reporting Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Hepatitis Monthly

Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran Corresponding author: Mahmood Salesi, Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran. Tel/Fax: +98-91968...

متن کامل

Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Korean Journal of Urology Over the Past 20 Years

PURPOSE Because low-quality trials may lead to erroneous conclusions, quality assessments are necessary. Thus, in this study, we scrutinized randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the Korean Journal of Urology (KJU) to assess their quantity and quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS Upon extracting RCTs from all articles published in the KJU from 1991 to 2010, assessments were made on the b...

متن کامل

Adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials on Pharmacological Interventions Published in Iranian Medical Journals

Background: Among manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) form the backbone of evidence-based medicine. Hence, their protocol should be designed rigorously and their results should be reported clearly. To improve the quality of RCT reporting, researchers developed the CONSORT Statement in 1996 and updated it in 2010. This study was designed to assess th...

متن کامل

Assessment of the Quality of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Five Leading Chinese Medical Journals

BACKGROUND Clear, transparent and sufficiently detailed abstracts of randomized trials (RCTs), published in journal articles are important because readers will often base their initial assessment of a trial on such information. However, little is known about the quality of reporting in abstracts of RCTs published in medical journals in China. METHODS We identified RCTs abstracts from 5 five l...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
nephro-urology monthly

جلد ۷، شماره ۴، صفحات ۰-۰

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023